Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Challenges for Peer Review
Peer review is not a fraud detection system. Referees are likely to detect some wrongdoing, such as copying someone else’s research or misrepresenting data, because they care about their subject. They know what research has been conducted already and the kinds of results that are likely. However, if someone deliberately sets out to falsify data, there is sometimes no way of knowing this until t...
متن کاملChallenges for Peer Review
Peer review is not a fraud detection system. Referees are likely to detect some wrongdoing, such as copying someone else’s research or misrepresenting data, because they care about their subject. They know what research has been conducted already and the kinds of results that are likely. However, if someone deliberately sets out to falsify data, there is sometimes no way of knowing this until t...
متن کاملPeer-reading Process and Its Ethical Challenges: Can We Hope for Moral Judgment?
Background: The role of refereeing and peer-reading in the ethics of research and publishing is very privileged and vital, and changes have occurred in this important part of scientific communication over the years. Despite the diversity in scientific judgments and the criticisms and challenges that have been brought to its implementation and nature, it is still accepted as a social norm in the...
متن کاملThe peer-review process.
Most authors experience that “sinking feeling” when reviewers’ comments and recommendations lead to rejection of a manuscript or the need for multiple revisions. It is important to bear in mind that this happens to most, if not all, scientists. Many times the reviewer or editor is correct, and with suitable revision, a better paper is ultimately published. Sometimes it is not. The author can th...
متن کاملThe peer-review process
The peer review process has been discussed at length in most of the established texts on the scholarly communication process, such as Ziman (1968), Ravetz (1973) and Meadows (1974). These authors agree that the four main functions of the scholarly literature are dissemination of current knowledge, archiving of the canonical knowledge base, quality control of published information, and assignmen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1633-8065,1432-1068
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1735-x